Castaic trout
-
- Roach
- Posts: 118
- Joined: Tue Oct 31 2023 20:31
Castaic trout
I’ve just received 2 6” castaic trout in slow sink. They came up on ebay for a sensible price, so I thought I’d give them a go as I’ve read some good reports on them. Looking back through some older threads, I can see that the quality plummeted at some point, as production moved elsewhere. I’m wondering if the ones I’ve ordered are original or the newer design? Is there any way to tell? The packaging on one is slightly different as it says ‘made in Mexico’ whereas the other says ‘assembled in Mexico’. My understanding is the newer ones sink a lot faster, but is there any other changes to the action, durability etc?
Thanks
Jack
Thanks
Jack
- Steve Dennington
- Zander
- Posts: 5705
- Joined: Mon Aug 29 2011 05:00
- Location: Suffolk
Re: Castaic trout
Jack H wrote: ↑Wed Nov 08 2023 15:18 -The main difference is the 10" slow sink. The old ones had a foam harness and sank horizontally, whereas the new ones sink nose first. The new ones are a different plastic too, which is definitely not as durable. Decent enough lures, but I wouldn't go back to them. The loose body versions available from various companies these days are far more versatile.I’ve just received 2 6” castaic trout in slow sink. They came up on ebay for a sensible price, so I thought I’d give them a go as I’ve read some good reports on them. Looking back through some older threads, I can see that the quality plummeted at some point, as production moved elsewhere. I’m wondering if the ones I’ve ordered are original or the newer design? Is there any way to tell? The packaging on one is slightly different as it says ‘made in Mexico’ whereas the other says ‘assembled in Mexico’. My understanding is the newer ones sink a lot faster, but is there any other changes to the action, durability etc?
Thanks
Jack
-
- Roach
- Posts: 118
- Joined: Tue Oct 31 2023 20:31
Re: Castaic trout
Cheers Steve. I didn’t pay over the odds for them, a couple of pounds more than a replicant. One of them is a mad shad pattern, which looks great as something a bit different on difficult days. I see what you mean about the durability, compared to a replicant, the plastic seems a lot softer. I can’t see them standing up to too much punishment.
Thanks
Jack
Thanks
Jack
- Steve Dennington
- Zander
- Posts: 5705
- Joined: Mon Aug 29 2011 05:00
- Location: Suffolk
Re: Castaic trout
Jack H wrote: ↑Wed Nov 08 2023 19:22 -Yep, some of the 10" ones I had started to fall to bits before they even saw teeth. As ever, when these products are changed it's not for the better. Same as with food products - whenever you see "new improved recipe" you just know it's going to result in a downturn in quality.Cheers Steve. I didn’t pay over the odds for them, a couple of pounds more than a replicant. One of them is a mad shad pattern, which looks great as something a bit different on difficult days. I see what you mean about the durability, compared to a replicant, the plastic seems a lot softer. I can’t see them standing up to too much punishment.
Thanks
Jack
-
- Roach
- Posts: 118
- Joined: Tue Oct 31 2023 20:31
Re: Castaic trout
Steve Dennington wrote: ↑Wed Nov 08 2023 20:33 -Unfortunately, that’s the case with lots of items at the moment. Higher prices, lower qualityJack H wrote: ↑Wed Nov 08 2023 19:22 -Yep, some of the 10" ones I had started to fall to bits before they even saw teeth. As ever, when these products are changed it's not for the better. Same as with food products - whenever you see "new improved recipe" you just know it's going to result in a downturn in quality.Cheers Steve. I didn’t pay over the odds for them, a couple of pounds more than a replicant. One of them is a mad shad pattern, which looks great as something a bit different on difficult days. I see what you mean about the durability, compared to a replicant, the plastic seems a lot softer. I can’t see them standing up to too much punishment.
Thanks
Jack
Jack
- Steve Dennington
- Zander
- Posts: 5705
- Joined: Mon Aug 29 2011 05:00
- Location: Suffolk
Re: Castaic trout
Jack H wrote: ↑Wed Nov 08 2023 21:29 -Very true. It seems that everything you buy these days is smaller or worse quality (or both) than it used to be.Steve Dennington wrote: ↑Wed Nov 08 2023 20:33 -Unfortunately, that’s the case with lots of items at the moment. Higher prices, lower qualityJack H wrote: ↑Wed Nov 08 2023 19:22 -Yep, some of the 10" ones I had started to fall to bits before they even saw teeth. As ever, when these products are changed it's not for the better. Same as with food products - whenever you see "new improved recipe" you just know it's going to result in a downturn in quality.Cheers Steve. I didn’t pay over the odds for them, a couple of pounds more than a replicant. One of them is a mad shad pattern, which looks great as something a bit different on difficult days. I see what you mean about the durability, compared to a replicant, the plastic seems a lot softer. I can’t see them standing up to too much punishment.
Thanks
Jack
Jack
-
- Jack Pike
- Posts: 396
- Joined: Tue Oct 25 2011 05:00
- Location: northern ireland
Re: Castaic trout
Don't rely on the bottom hook on them , take it off and rig one externally, the bottom harness is very unreliable.
-
- Roach
- Posts: 118
- Joined: Tue Oct 31 2023 20:31
Re: Castaic trout
r0bert wrote: ↑Sat Nov 18 2023 16:10 -Thanks, the 2 I’ve got don’t have bottom trebles, just a large single on top. Have you found just the single good enough when it comes to hookups? Or do you think a bottom treble helps significantly?Don't rely on the bottom hook on them , take it off and rig one externally, the bottom harness is very unreliable.
Jack
- Steve Dennington
- Zander
- Posts: 5705
- Joined: Mon Aug 29 2011 05:00
- Location: Suffolk
Re: Castaic trout
Jack H wrote: ↑Sat Nov 18 2023 17:37 -The single hook alone will give a woeful hook up ratio. I bend the point of that one down to the back with pliers to put it out of action (I don't like big upward facing singles on any lure) and rig with one or two trebles.r0bert wrote: ↑Sat Nov 18 2023 16:10 -Thanks, the 2 I’ve got don’t have bottom trebles, just a large single on top. Have you found just the single good enough when it comes to hookups? Or do you think a bottom treble helps significantly?Don't rely on the bottom hook on them , take it off and rig one externally, the bottom harness is very unreliable.
Jack
-
- Roach
- Posts: 118
- Joined: Tue Oct 31 2023 20:31
Re: Castaic trout
Steve Dennington wrote: ↑Sat Nov 18 2023 17:53 -Jack H wrote: ↑Sat Nov 18 2023 17:37 -The single hook alone will give a woeful hook up ratio. I bend the point of that one down to the back with pliers to put it out of action (I don't like big upward facing singles on any lure) and rig with one or two trebles.r0bert wrote: ↑Sat Nov 18 2023 16:10 -Thanks, the 2 I’ve got don’t have bottom trebles, just a large single on top. Have you found just the single good enough when it comes to hookups? Or do you think a bottom treble helps significantly?Don't rely on the bottom hook on them , take it off and rig one externally, the bottom harness is very unreliable.
Jack

Oversized, like those on replicants, which look like they’ll cause unnecessary damage.
Jack
-
- Jack Pike
- Posts: 263
- Joined: Sun Aug 28 2011 05:00
Re: Castaic trout
What are the Castaics worth nowadays? I’ve a box full somewhere but not packaged….
-
- Roach
- Posts: 118
- Joined: Tue Oct 31 2023 20:31
Re: Castaic trout
Andy Scott wrote: ↑Sat Nov 18 2023 22:10 -Not sure, there’s a 10” one on eBay £27.99. I think as Steve has said there are better alternative’s available for less. I only bought them as they were going cheap for the pair.What are the Castaics worth nowadays? I’ve a box full somewhere but not packaged….
Jack