Lure placement photos by sponsored anglers
-
- Chub
- Posts: 1399
- Joined: Sat May 21 2016 15:41
- Location: Beffnal Green innit
Lure placement photos by sponsored anglers
I think this is the worst/most obvious example I've ever seen. Are we supposed to think it was landed like this?
From a pro Swedish angler on Insta, to promote a new Buster Jerk colour.
(Also a great pic for the flouro-fans - that trace looks pretty shredded)
From a pro Swedish angler on Insta, to promote a new Buster Jerk colour.
(Also a great pic for the flouro-fans - that trace looks pretty shredded)
You do not have the required permissions to view the files attached to this post.
The dildo of consequences rarely arrives lubed
- alan behenna
- Barbel
- Posts: 3767
- Joined: Mon Sep 14 2015 15:45
- Location: Where Sheep are Nervous.
Re: Lure placement photos by sponsored anglers
We are seeing this Blatent "in-yer-face" product placement more and more, used to it by now though, mostly by so called "pro" anglers (read sponsored) and your general Muppet.
Seems they are more interested in showing a lure off than a good fish.
Seems they are more interested in showing a lure off than a good fish.
- John Milford
- Ferox Trout
- Posts: 11000
- Joined: Sun Aug 28 2011 05:00
- Location: Cloud Cuckoo Land
Re: Lure placement photos by sponsored anglers
Seems legit to me. The pike obviously wanted the sponsored lure soooo much, it clamped on and wouldn't let go, even though it wasn't hooked!!
"He's some sort of lure savant. Or just has an unhealthy addiction to old lures. We are not quite sure . . . . . "
-
- Perch
- Posts: 723
- Joined: Fri Oct 25 2019 11:29
Re: Lure placement photos by sponsored anglers
It's only a promo shot....and the Lure does look lovely.
- Andrew
- Bailiff
- Posts: 15569
- Joined: Wed Nov 02 2011 05:00
Re: Lure placement photos by sponsored anglers
The state of that fluoro
JohnCopeman wrote: βMon Apr 12 2021 11:10 -I wonder how many shots were taken at different angles and with different lures and hats, jackets, etc. Its just cringey as hell and doesnt make me want to buy the lure.It's only a promo shot....and the Lure does look lovely.
- DaveGreenwood
- Zander
- Posts: 5650
- Joined: Sun Aug 28 2011 05:00
- Location: On Top
Re: Lure placement photos by sponsored anglers
Sadly plenty will still fall for it and dodgy flouro leaders.
- Steve Dennington
- Zander
- Posts: 6018
- Joined: Mon Aug 29 2011 05:00
- Location: Suffolk
Re: Lure placement photos by sponsored anglers
DaveGreenwood wrote: βMon Apr 12 2021 11:37 -Talking of the leader, have a close look at the first two inches from the clip! Dodgy leader material indeedSadly plenty will still fall for it and dodgy flouro leaders.
- DaveGreenwood
- Zander
- Posts: 5650
- Joined: Sun Aug 28 2011 05:00
- Location: On Top
Re: Lure placement photos by sponsored anglers
Steve Dennington wrote: βMon Apr 12 2021 12:37 -DaveGreenwood wrote: βMon Apr 12 2021 11:37 -Talking of the leader, have a close look at the first two inches from the clip! Dodgy leader material indeedSadly plenty will still fall for it and dodgy flouro leaders.
I spotted the damage Steve, some so called Pike anglers simply donβt give a s**t.
- fossil-fish
- Perch
- Posts: 731
- Joined: Fri Mar 10 2017 17:25
- Location: County Antrim
Re: Lure placement photos by sponsored anglers
Almost appears to be a condition of being sponsored by any Scandinavian tackle company that you must at all times use fluorocarbon when fishing for pike. Even blokes from Ireland and UK, where there is no tradition of fluorocarbon leaders, are all over YouTube using it because of tie ups with either Savage Gear or Westin.
Michael Bruton
- Carlperkins
- Bailiff
- Posts: 14811
- Joined: Sat Aug 27 2011 05:00
- Location: coventry
Re: Lure placement photos by sponsored anglers
Isnβt that what caused the fall out on the original pit
Pike and predators were well known for it
Pike and predators were well known for it
That Perkins !!!
- Mark Phillips
- Barbel
- Posts: 4991
- Joined: Tue Aug 30 2011 05:00
- Location: East Anglia
Re: Lure placement photos by sponsored anglers
JoeNickel wrote: βMon Apr 12 2021 10:32 -Does look as if the lure has been wedged in there nice picture, as it shows people how s**t the FC leader isI think this is the worst/most obvious example I've ever seen. Are we supposed to think it was landed like this?
From a pro Swedish angler on Insta, to promote a new Buster Jerk colour.
Screenshot_20210412-102905_Instagram.jpg
(Also a great pic for the flouro-fans - that trace looks pretty shredded)
I have a much better picture of some handsome fella with a Buster Jerk in a pike's chops - no fakery here
Piking Plonker
- Andrew
- Bailiff
- Posts: 15569
- Joined: Wed Nov 02 2011 05:00
Re: Lure placement photos by sponsored anglers
Carlperkins wrote: βMon Apr 12 2021 17:50 -By Original pit u mean the p&p forum ? I wasnt around for the fallout but was to do with members not being able to criticise their sponsors etc. Was the final nail to do with product placement like this ?Isnβt that what caused the fall out on the original pit
Pike and predators were well known for it
- Andrew
- Bailiff
- Posts: 15569
- Joined: Wed Nov 02 2011 05:00
Re: Lure placement photos by sponsored anglers
Mark Phillips wrote: βMon Apr 12 2021 18:03 -You wont ever convince me that that pike in the first post was caught on that lure. I could be wrong but I dont think that pike took such a large lure far back enough to cause that damage to the fluoro like that.JoeNickel wrote: βMon Apr 12 2021 10:32 -Does look as if the lure has been wedged in there nice picture, as it shows people how s**t the FC leader isI think this is the worst/most obvious example I've ever seen. Are we supposed to think it was landed like this?
From a pro Swedish angler on Insta, to promote a new Buster Jerk colour.
Screenshot_20210412-102905_Instagram.jpg
(Also a great pic for the flouro-fans - that trace looks pretty shredded)
I have a much better picture of some handsome fella with a Buster Jerk in a pike's chops - no fakery here
Then it begs the question, did they continue fishing with it that badly damaged
Also cant see a pic in your post
- Mark Phillips
- Barbel
- Posts: 4991
- Joined: Tue Aug 30 2011 05:00
- Location: East Anglia
Re: Lure placement photos by sponsored anglers
Andrew Croft wrote: βMon Apr 12 2021 18:15 -Yep, I make you right on that - it's clearly been shoved into its chops. As I have often said, I did use FC leaders for a very brief period many years ago and found they get nicked up very quickly and you have to keep changing them or risk a bite off. I saw no advantage to using them and to give any kind of defence against teeth, you need to use quite thick diameters - which are in fact very visible, which kind of shoots down the theory that you'll catch more pike as they can't see the leader - not that I think a pike will be put off taking any lure due to seeing a leader - my catch rates didn't go up or down when I tried them, so that experiment came to a swift conclusion. Titanium wire beats it hands down.Mark Phillips wrote: βMon Apr 12 2021 18:03 -You wont ever convince me that that pike in the first post was caught on that lure. I could be wrong but I dont think that pike took such a large lure far back enough to cause that damage to the fluoro like that.JoeNickel wrote: βMon Apr 12 2021 10:32 -Does look as if the lure has been wedged in there nice picture, as it shows people how s**t the FC leader isI think this is the worst/most obvious example I've ever seen. Are we supposed to think it was landed like this?
From a pro Swedish angler on Insta, to promote a new Buster Jerk colour.
Screenshot_20210412-102905_Instagram.jpg
(Also a great pic for the flouro-fans - that trace looks pretty shredded)
I have a much better picture of some handsome fella with a Buster Jerk in a pike's chops - no fakery here
Then it begs the question, did they continue fishing with it that badly damaged
Also cant see a pic in your post
Piking Plonker
- Steve Dennington
- Zander
- Posts: 6018
- Joined: Mon Aug 29 2011 05:00
- Location: Suffolk
Re: Lure placement photos by sponsored anglers
Andrew Croft wrote: βMon Apr 12 2021 18:15 -It's entirely possible that the fish in the pic damaged that leader. You're assuming that the lure was hit from behind and engulfed tail first, but that's not how it happens every time. If that lure was engulfed head first, which happens often enough, an even smaller fish could have its teeth on the leader.You wont ever convince me that that pike in the first post was caught on that lure. I could be wrong but I dont think that pike took such a large lure far back enough to cause that damage to the fluoro like that.
Obviously the pic was set up, but my point is that any pike could bite you off if they get their teeth on fluoro and it doesn't require a huge fish.
- Andrew
- Bailiff
- Posts: 15569
- Joined: Wed Nov 02 2011 05:00
Re: Lure placement photos by sponsored anglers
Steve Dennington wrote: βMon Apr 12 2021 21:14 -Fair point Steve. I'd still put a wager on my theory thoughAndrew Croft wrote: βMon Apr 12 2021 18:15 -It's entirely possible that the fish in the pic damaged that leader. You're assuming that the lure was hit from behind and engulfed tail first, but that's not how it happens every time. If that lure was engulfed head first, which happens often enough, an even smaller fish could have its teeth on the leader.You wont ever convince me that that pike in the first post was caught on that lure. I could be wrong but I dont think that pike took such a large lure far back enough to cause that damage to the fluoro like that.
Obviously the pic was set up, but my point is that any pike could bite you off if they get their teeth on fluoro and it doesn't require a huge fish.
-
- Barbel
- Posts: 3853
- Joined: Thu Jul 16 2015 21:20
- Location: Bury
Re: Lure placement photos by sponsored anglers
Iβd be more concerned with the size of those trebles
- Steve Dennington
- Zander
- Posts: 6018
- Joined: Mon Aug 29 2011 05:00
- Location: Suffolk
Re: Lure placement photos by sponsored anglers
Nige Johns wrote: βMon Apr 12 2021 21:45 -Maybe 2/0s? I can't see any cause for concern thereIβd be more concerned with the size of those trebles
- Mark Phillips
- Barbel
- Posts: 4991
- Joined: Tue Aug 30 2011 05:00
- Location: East Anglia
Re: Lure placement photos by sponsored anglers
Steve Dennington wrote: βMon Apr 12 2021 21:49 -Nor me, the trebles look spot on. I have 2/0's on all my Busters, so I'd say you're right Steve.Nige Johns wrote: βMon Apr 12 2021 21:45 -Maybe 2/0s? I can't see any cause for concern thereIβd be more concerned with the size of those trebles
Piking Plonker
- John Milford
- Ferox Trout
- Posts: 11000
- Joined: Sun Aug 28 2011 05:00
- Location: Cloud Cuckoo Land
Re: Lure placement photos by sponsored anglers
It's way better than some of the 'placement' photos used to promote a certain worldwide brand of lures in the 1990s.
There was a spate of impossible 'action' close-ups, supposedly of the very instant the fish broke surface upon 'hitting' the bait.
I saw one on a UK magazine cover once - a pike and lure in perfect focus, but water spray blurred by movement.
Of course the pike was in perfect focus - because it was dead! If you looked very closely, you could actually make out the glass rod supporting its head!
There was a spate of impossible 'action' close-ups, supposedly of the very instant the fish broke surface upon 'hitting' the bait.
I saw one on a UK magazine cover once - a pike and lure in perfect focus, but water spray blurred by movement.
Of course the pike was in perfect focus - because it was dead! If you looked very closely, you could actually make out the glass rod supporting its head!
"He's some sort of lure savant. Or just has an unhealthy addiction to old lures. We are not quite sure . . . . . "
- frankcarty
- Roach
- Posts: 237
- Joined: Thu Jan 31 2013 06:00
- Location: West of Ireland
Re: Lure placement photos by sponsored anglers
JoeNickel wrote: βMon Apr 12 2021 10:32 -aw I've seen a lot worse, at least that lure is actually attached to a trace!I think this is the worst/most obvious example I've ever seen. Are we supposed to think it was landed like this?
From a pro Swedish angler on Insta, to promote a new Buster Jerk colour.
Screenshot_20210412-102905_Instagram.jpg
(Also a great pic for the flouro-fans - that trace looks pretty shredded)
- davelumb
- Forum Sponsor
- Posts: 42518
- Joined: Sat Aug 27 2011 05:00
- Location: On some faraway beach
- Contact:
Re: Lure placement photos by sponsored anglers
frankcarty wrote: βWed Apr 14 2021 16:12 -JoeNickel wrote: βMon Apr 12 2021 10:32 -aw I've seen a lot worse, at least that lure is actually attached to a trace!I think this is the worst/most obvious example I've ever seen. Are we supposed to think it was landed like this?
From a pro Swedish angler on Insta, to promote a new Buster Jerk colour.
Screenshot_20210412-102905_Instagram.jpg
(Also a great pic for the flouro-fans - that trace looks pretty shredded)
-
- Roach
- Posts: 167
- Joined: Mon Sep 05 2011 05:00
- Location: Ontario, Canada
Re: Lure placement photos by sponsored anglers
It's all b******s I tell eheeee....since lure fishing was capable of being photographed! Piking prostitutes mainly.....sponsored by particular lure related companies...pieces of eight, pieces of eight....
Standing by for incoming....
Standing by for incoming....
-
- Perch
- Posts: 508
- Joined: Mon Aug 29 2011 05:00
- Location: The wild west.
Re: Lure placement photos by sponsored anglers
frankcarty wrote: βWed Apr 14 2021 16:12 -Rediculous Frank. That pike is so easily identified with that scar to its upper jaw.JoeNickel wrote: βMon Apr 12 2021 10:32 -aw I've seen a lot worse, at least that lure is actually attached to a trace!I think this is the worst/most obvious example I've ever seen. Are we supposed to think it was landed like this?
From a pro Swedish angler on Insta, to promote a new Buster Jerk colour.
Screenshot_20210412-102905_Instagram.jpg
(Also a great pic for the flouro-fans - that trace looks pretty shredded)
Is that fish dead?
Brendan Taaffe.
-
- Chub
- Posts: 1399
- Joined: Sat May 21 2016 15:41
- Location: Beffnal Green innit
Re: Lure placement photos by sponsored anglers
Oh wow - she's claiming to have caught the same massive fish on three different lures
It might be dead - it does look kinda saggy. Proper clonker though.
It might be dead - it does look kinda saggy. Proper clonker though.
The dildo of consequences rarely arrives lubed
-
- Perch
- Posts: 977
- Joined: Thu Sep 19 2013 15:05
Re: Lure placement photos by sponsored anglers
One guy on Facebook is always getting those perfect hookups It's incredible.
- Mark Phillips
- Barbel
- Posts: 4991
- Joined: Tue Aug 30 2011 05:00
- Location: East Anglia
Re: Lure placement photos by sponsored anglers
To be fair to some people, it's not a big deal in the grand scheme of things if they genuinely caught the pike on the lure. When I was field testing lures and writing reviews, I'd occasionally unhook the pike - then hang the lure I caught it with from the chops - very obvious to anyone I would have thought that it wasn't hooked like that. Debatable practice in some people's opinion, but in some ways, I'd rather see a fish photographed like that, i.e. after it has been unhooked It's the people photographing pike with lures they didn't catch them on that's the real issue in question - clearly that goes on a fair bit and isn't cricket, as it is misleading potential buyers. I think if you want to see how effective certain lures are, watch a video or ask someone who isn't sponsored.
As far as the Buster Jerk goes - it doesn't need any promoting IMO, it's one of those lures that just works and I suspect most people will have several in their collection - even last week, whilst working my way round a big, clear pit - half the pike I caught came to a fire tiger sinking Buster, despite chucking quite a range of baits, that was definitely the lure getting the most interest - mainly as it can be cast a good distance, holds its depth, responds well to different retrieves and has a very decent rattle. Hook-up rate and build quality is excellent too. Firmly one of my go to jerk baits.
As far as the Buster Jerk goes - it doesn't need any promoting IMO, it's one of those lures that just works and I suspect most people will have several in their collection - even last week, whilst working my way round a big, clear pit - half the pike I caught came to a fire tiger sinking Buster, despite chucking quite a range of baits, that was definitely the lure getting the most interest - mainly as it can be cast a good distance, holds its depth, responds well to different retrieves and has a very decent rattle. Hook-up rate and build quality is excellent too. Firmly one of my go to jerk baits.
Piking Plonker
-
- Roach
- Posts: 212
- Joined: Tue Feb 06 2018 22:46
Re: Lure placement photos by sponsored anglers
First thing should be to unhook the Pike and make sure it's ok, if your more interested in leaving the lure in the fish then you haven't got it's best interest at heart, just my thoughts.
- Steve Dennington
- Zander
- Posts: 6018
- Joined: Mon Aug 29 2011 05:00
- Location: Suffolk
Re: Lure placement photos by sponsored anglers
Mark Phillips wrote: βFri Apr 16 2021 15:07 -Agreed. They're one of the few plastic glidebaits that have remained a must-have lure for me over the years. The shallow version is brilliant at this time of year too, working down to about a foot or so, with a very slow rise on the pause with the right combination of hooks and split ringsAs far as the Buster Jerk goes - it doesn't need any promoting IMO, it's one of those lures that just works and I suspect most people will have several in their collection - even last week, whilst working my way round a big, clear pit - half the pike I caught came to a fire tiger sinking Buster, despite chucking quite a range of baits, that was definitely the lure getting the most interest - mainly as it can be cast a good distance, holds its depth, responds well to different retrieves and has a very decent rattle. Hook-up rate and build quality is excellent too. Firmly one of my go to jerk baits.
- fisherman
- Jack Pike
- Posts: 370
- Joined: Fri Aug 31 2012 05:00
- Location: cavan ireland
Re: Lure placement photos by sponsored anglers
fossil-fish wrote: βMon Apr 12 2021 15:51 -Yeah Im seeing loads using flouro these day for pike not many using wire for lure fishing at all, and your made out to be a fool for recommending wire to them and telling them fluro is badEven blokes from Ireland and UK, where there is no tradition of fluorocarbon leaders, are all over YouTube using it because of tie ups with either Savage Gear or Westin.