After waiting an age for a decent deal on a Sony e mount prime, I took the plunge at the weekend and purchased A new 28mm f2, which I am told on my Sony aps-c sensor will give me around 42mm focal length.
Played around at the weekend in the garden and then woods, am am delighted in the reduction in dof that I can get, but stopping it down all the way seams like it will be too shallow for fish portraits.
At say iso400, with a prime lens, what is people's go to stop number for portraits?
New lens
- Duncan Holmes
- Barbel
- Posts: 4946
- Joined: Mon Feb 20 2012 06:00
- Location: In the heart of Norfolk
- Contact:
New lens
"The opinions expressed in any of my posts are my own and do not reflect the view of the any organisation that I may be associated with."
- davelumb
- Forum Sponsor
- Posts: 42342
- Joined: Sat Aug 27 2011 05:00
- Location: On some faraway beach
- Contact:
Re: New lens
I don't understand why stopping it down will not give you enough depth of field. The more you stop a lens down the greater the DoF becomes. Prime or zoom makes no odds, it's aperture, focal length and distance from subject which affects DoF. (And if being pedantic image size and distance when looking at the picture too!)
I'd have thought f5.6 would be adequate with that set up for trophy shots.
I'd have thought f5.6 would be adequate with that set up for trophy shots.
- Duncan Holmes
- Barbel
- Posts: 4946
- Joined: Mon Feb 20 2012 06:00
- Location: In the heart of Norfolk
- Contact:
Re: New lens
davelumb wrote: ↑Mon Aug 06 2018 21:19 -Maybe I got my up and down mixed upI don't understand why stopping it down will not give you enough depth of field. The more you stop a lens down the greater the DoF becomes. Prime or zoom makes no odds, it's aperture, focal length and distance from subject which affects DoF. (And if being pedantic image size and distance when looking at the picture too!)
I'd have thought f5.6 would be adequate with that set up for trophy shots.
I meant lower number when I said down.
I love the blurred background look that makes the subject pop out of the photo. My package lens didn't really give me the level of background blur that I wanted. This lens does, but I thought I was going to need to go low numbers to get the effect, but it looks like I don't need to go as low as I thought.
6 ft seams about right with framing for trophy shot,
"The opinions expressed in any of my posts are my own and do not reflect the view of the any organisation that I may be associated with."
- davelumb
- Forum Sponsor
- Posts: 42342
- Joined: Sat Aug 27 2011 05:00
- Location: On some faraway beach
- Contact:
Re: New lens
Stopping down means making the aperture smaller. The the smaller the f number the bigger the aperture and the more the DoF. So you would stop down from f4 to f8.
The smaller the f number the larger the aperture and the less the DoF.
It can be confusing.
Camera to subject distance should really be defined by how you want to frame the shot. With a fixed focal length you're a bit limited in that respect.
The smaller the f number the larger the aperture and the less the DoF.
It can be confusing.
Camera to subject distance should really be defined by how you want to frame the shot. With a fixed focal length you're a bit limited in that respect.
- davelumb
- Forum Sponsor
- Posts: 42342
- Joined: Sat Aug 27 2011 05:00
- Location: On some faraway beach
- Contact:
Re: New lens
Rethink. I forgot it's an APS sensor, so f2.8 to f4 might be a better bet to get fish and angler oth reasonably sharp and the background blurred. But as I said, how far the background is behind the angler makes a difference.
- Duncan Holmes
- Barbel
- Posts: 4946
- Joined: Mon Feb 20 2012 06:00
- Location: In the heart of Norfolk
- Contact:
Re: New lens
davelumb wrote: ↑Mon Aug 06 2018 21:46 -Thanks, knew the smaller number was bigger hole, but know know the up and down terminologyStopping down means making the aperture smaller. The the smaller the f number the bigger the aperture and the more the DoF. So you would stop down from f4 to f8.
The smaller the f number the larger the aperture and the less the DoF.
It can be confusing.
Camera to subject distance should really be defined by how you want to frame the shot. With a fixed focal length you're a bit limited in that respect.
Certainly noticed the difference framing over the zoom, can't remember the last time I had a fixed lens, probably on an old ae1 program 30 years ago.
Also learned how to manual focus the camera at the weekend, using the focus zoom.
Tbh the camera has always taken nice photos, but it was quite fun learning how to make the camera do what you want rather than rely on P or I settings.
"The opinions expressed in any of my posts are my own and do not reflect the view of the any organisation that I may be associated with."
- davelumb
- Forum Sponsor
- Posts: 42342
- Joined: Sat Aug 27 2011 05:00
- Location: On some faraway beach
- Contact:
Re: New lens
Just to show that a small aperture isn't all there is to shallow DoF this was taken with a 50mm on full frame at f4. And there isn't much in focus.
-
- Zander
- Posts: 9950
- Joined: Tue Nov 06 2012 06:00
- Location: Cambs
Re: New lens
Cheeers Alan
"Luck is what happens when preparation meets opportunity" Seneca, some Roman chap.